Nose and Buteyko · 4 min read
BOLT score and control pause: what your number really means
How long can you comfortably hold your breath after a normal exhale? That number is called the control pause, or BOLT score, and the internet is full of charts for it. You can measure it right here. You’ll also learn what it means, what it doesn’t, and why your own trend matters more than any chart.
Key takeaways
- What it measures: how long you can comfortably hold your breath after a normal exhale, until the first clear urge to breathe, not as long as you possibly can.
- There are no validated norms. Charts by age online don’t cite a source.
- It doesn’t predict the carbon dioxide level in your body, and in two studies it wasn’t linked to fitness.
- Only your own trend is meaningful: same time of day, same position, same routine.
What the control pause is
The control pause comes from the Buteyko method. It’s the time you can comfortably hold your breath after a normal exhale.1 It’s explicitly not about holding out as long as possible: the test ends at the first clear urge to breathe, which makes it a subjective measure.2 One version of it goes by BOLT score.
How to measure it
- Sit quietly for a few minutes and breathe normally through your nose. Ideally at the same time of day each time, for example in the morning.
- Breathe out normally and gently, not especially deep.
- Pinch your nose and start the timer.
- Stop at the first clear urge to breathe, not when you can’t hold on any longer.
- Then keep breathing calmly through your nose. If you need to gasp, you waited too long.
seconds to first urge to breathe
What the number means, and what it doesn’t
It doesn’t measure carbon dioxide in your body. Buteyko assumed that a longer control pause means more carbon dioxide in the lungs. But among 83 adults, the relationship was weak and actually went the other way.3 A second study from the same group found no link with carbon dioxide at all.4 A review by breathing and exercise scientists calls Buteyko’s assumption disproven.5
It doesn’t show how fit you are. In 28 active college students, the BOLT score wasn’t linked to endurance.6 In 49 elite athletes, it wasn’t either, and the researchers note that the test hasn’t been scientifically validated.2
A lot plays into it. Why we can’t hold our breath any longer isn’t easy to explain; blood gases, lungs, muscles, and willpower all interact.7 Even an unnoticed deeper breath before the hold can noticeably lower carbon dioxide and change your number.8
- It measures how long you can comfortably hold your breath after a normal exhale, until the first clear urge to breathe.
- How you measure changes the number a lot, for example whether you took a deeper breath first.
- Lung volume, muscles, willpower, and discomfort play a part too, as does how strongly your body reacts to carbon dioxide.
- The number doesn’t predict the carbon dioxide level in your body. It’s only comparable with your own number under the same conditions.
Are there norms by age?
No. I found no validated norms by age in PubMed or Europe PMC, and the charts online don’t cite a source. For context, not as a norm: in one study, 30 healthy adults had an average control pause of 18 seconds, with a wide spread.1 What’s meaningful is only your own number over time, measured the same way.
Can you improve your score?
Yes, you get better at holding your breath with practice. In healthy athletes, several studies found that breath-hold training improved hold times, but not performance.2 So a higher number mainly shows that you’ve practiced holding your breath, not that you’re healthier or fitter.
What about the “CO2 tolerance test”?
In the Stanford breathing study, participants timed how long they could slowly breathe out after a deep inhale. The result was only used to set the length of the phases for box breathing, and the study doesn’t report any results for the test itself.9 I found no study validating it as a measure of “CO2 tolerance.”
Only hold until the first clear urge to breathe, not as long as you can. Never measure in or near water or while driving, and don’t breathe fast and deep beforehand: in a CDC report, all four people who died while holding their breath underwater had deliberately hyperventilated first.10 Measure at rest, not right after exercise. The control pause isn’t a medical measurement and isn’t a test for asthma, anxiety, or any other condition; never change prescribed treatment because of it. If you’re pregnant or have a heart or circulation condition, high blood pressure, epilepsy, glaucoma, or panic disorder, check with your doctor first.
Common questions
- What’s a good BOLT score?
- Studies can’t say. There are no validated norms. In one study, healthy adults averaged 18 seconds, with a wide spread.1
- Does the control pause measure my CO2 tolerance?
- Partly at most. It doesn’t predict the carbon dioxide level in your body, and many other things play a part.3, 7
- Does my BOLT score say anything about my fitness?
- Not in two studies, neither in active college students nor in elite athletes.6, 2
- Is a low score a sign of stress or anxiety?
- No, the control pause isn’t a test for stress or anxiety. If anxiety weighs on you often, talk to a professional.
- How often should I measure?
- There’s no study on that. What matters is measuring under the same conditions every time, for example sitting in the morning before your day gets going.
This article shares general information about breathing exercises for relaxation and well-being. It is not medical advice and does not replace diagnosis or treatment by a licensed professional. nowa is a wellness app. It is not a medical device and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Only practice while it feels comfortable. If you feel dizzy or short of breath, or notice a racing heart, chest pain, or strong anxiety, stop and breathe normally. If you have a medical condition (for example a heart or lung condition, or epilepsy) or are pregnant, talk to your doctor or midwife before trying new breathing exercises. Never change prescribed treatment on your own.
Sources
- Vagedes K, Kuderer S, Ehmann R, Kohl M, Wildhaber J, Jörres RA, Vagedes J (2024). Effect of Buteyko breathing technique on clinical and functional parameters in adult patients with asthma: a randomized, controlled study. European Journal of Medical Research 29(1):42. doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01634-1
Randomized study; cited here: definition and values of the 30 healthy comparison participants - Kowalski T, Rebis K, Wilk A, Klusiewicz A, Wiecha S, Paleczny B (2024). Body Oxygen Level Test (BOLT) is not associated with exercise performance in highly-trained individuals. Frontiers in Physiology 15:1430837. doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1430837
Cross-sectional study, 49 elite athletes - Courtney R, Cohen M (2008). Investigating the claims of Konstantin Buteyko, M.D., Ph.D.: the relationship of breath holding time to end tidal CO2 and other proposed measures of dysfunctional breathing. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 14(2):115–123. doi.org/10.1089/acm.2007.7204
Cross-sectional study, 83 adults - Courtney R, Greenwood KM, Cohen M (2011). Relationships between measures of dysfunctional breathing in a population with concerns about their breathing. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 15(1):24–34. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.06.004
Cross-sectional study, 84 people - Illidi CR, Romer LM, Johnson MA, Williams NC, Rossiter HB, Casaburi R, Tiller NB (2023). Distinguishing science from pseudoscience in commercial respiratory interventions: an evidence-based guide for health and exercise professionals. European Journal of Applied Physiology 123(8):1599–1625. doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05166-8
Review - Marko D, Krajcigr M, Bahenský P (2026). Association between BOLT score, aerobic fitness, and physical activity in active university students: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 66(3):329–339. doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.25.17282-4
Cross-sectional study, 28 active students - Parkes MJ (2006). Breath-holding and its breakpoint. Experimental Physiology 91(1):1–15. doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.2005.031625
Review - Zerweck L, Schrade G, Manger A, Haas P, Döbele S, Nieß A, Ernemann U, Hauser TK (2026). End-tidal CO2 changes during short breath-hold maneuvers: variability, paradigm effects, and spirometric correlates. Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology 345:104637. doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2026.104637
Measurement study, 20 healthy volunteers - Balban MY, Neri E, Kogon MM, Weed L, Nouriani B, Jo B, Holl G, Zeitzer JM, Spiegel D, Huberman AD (2023). Brief structured respiration practices enhance mood and reduce physiological arousal. Cell Reports Medicine 4(1):100895. doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100895
Randomized study, remote, 108 healthy adults - Boyd C, Levy A, McProud T, Huang L, Raneses E, Olson C (2015). Fatal and nonfatal drowning outcomes related to dangerous underwater breath-holding behaviors: New York State, 1988–2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 64(19):518–521. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584570
CDC case report, 16 cases
All sources last checked on October 28, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Write to support@nowabreathing.com and I’ll fix it and note the change here.